news story
15th July 2009
MP Challenges Ministers over Gypsy & Traveller
Policy in South Glos
Click
here to read the debate
Northavon MP Steve Webb has led a debate in
Parliament over the issue of the allocation of gypsy and traveller sites
in South Gloucestershire. The MP led a 30
minute debate on Tuesday 14th July, prompted
by local concerns over the way that traveller sites have recently got
through the planning system or may be allocated in the future.
Within the last few weeks a particularly controversial
planning application for a site at Hall End in the Rangeworthy area was
narrowly approved by the Council, despite the same Council having spent
years taking enforcement action on the same site to remove an
unauthorised encampment. At around the same time the Council indicated
that it was considering including a new 'supersite' in a nearby rural
area north of Yate in its current two-year consultation process on
suitable gypsy and traveller sites.
Hundreds of local residents attended a protest meeting
angry at the way local views were ignored by councillors from other
areas when the Hall End application was approved, and attention is now
turning to the proposed 'supersite' at Tanhouse Lane. This proposed site
could have room for at least a dozen 'pitches' which could mean many
times that number of caravans, utility blocks etc. in a rural area
poorly served by country roads, near a busy railway line and with no
mains drainage.
Commenting ahead of the debate, Steve Webb said:
"It is right that the Council should try to identify suitable sites
across South Gloucestershire for gypsies and travellers, but local
residents are angry that clearly unsuitable sites have been approved by
councillors who appear to have no interest in the views of local people.
"Although the Council is
consulting on its long-term strategy for sites, the campaigners I have
met have no faith that their views will be listened to in the future
when they have been so clearly ignored in the recent past.
"If the Council were to
include the Tanhouse Lane 'supersite' in its Autumn consultation
document, this would be the clearest indication yet that they were
simply not listening to local people. This is not a site that should be
approved for traditional housing development and it should not be
approved as a travellers site for exactly the same reasons.
"I believe that all groups in society should be treated fairly - the
majority who make up the settled community and also those who are
gypsies and travellers. But at present it seems that the rules are not
fair and are not being applied equally.
"I will be asking ministers to
look at the impact of the duties that they have placed on Councils with
regard to gypsies and travellers. We need a system that is fair and is
seen to be fair to all concerned".
|