News story
7th November 2005
MP to Speak Out Over "Gagged" Councillor
Northavon MP Steve Webb will tomorrow (Tuesday 8th) challenge
ministers at Westminster over rules which have prevented a South
Gloucestershire councillor from speaking out for local people. The MP
will lead a 30 minute debate at Westminster (at 1.30pm) on the role of
councillors in determining planning applications and will highlight the
case of Westerleigh councillor Alan Bracey who has been told that he
cannot speak at or attend a council planning meeting to discuss a
planning application in his ward.
The application relates to Network Rail's plans to fell large numbers
of trees in the Westerleigh and Coalpit Heath area in connection with
track safety work. Over the past year, Cllr Bracey has publicly stated
his opposition to the way in which Network Rail has acted and, having
taken sides on the issue, agreed to forego his right to vote on planning
applications relating to this case. However, he has now been told that
because he lives near the affected railway track, he has a "personal and
prejudicial" interest in the case and therefore may not speak at or even
attend the relevant planning meeting.
Alan Bracey's case has now been taken up by Steve Webb MP who will argue
that the rules on the role of councillors have gone too far and are
preventing councillors from doing the job of representing their own
community. He will compare the position of councillors with that of MPs
who, once they have declared an interest, are generally free both to
speak and vote on issues in which they have an interest.
Steve Webb said:
"The key role of a local councillor is to represent their local
community. In most cases, councillors live in that community and are
therefore affected by any major planning applications relating to their
area. But it would be a nonsense if they were therefore gagged and
prevented from speaking out for local people. It is common sense that
provided people are honest and open about the effect an application will
have on them, they should be allowed to speak. I will be urging the
Government to think again about the present rules".
Note to editors:
The Committee on Standards in Public Life, in a report earlier this
year, recommended:
"R28. In planning decisions the ability of elected members to
represent constituents' interests where they have personal and
prejudicial interests has been unnecessarily diminished. This should be
changed to give any elected member the right to speak (but not vote) for
their constituents at a planning committee meeting or at any other
quasi- regulatory meeting..."
Steve Webb will be endorsing this position.
|